Liquidity Gap Report for Stress Testing Structural Liquidity Risk
Published: 2017
Author(s) Name: Eugenia Schmitt |
Author(s) Affiliation: FinRiskConsult, Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Germany.
Locked
Subscribed
Available for All
Abstract
The need to focus on banks funding structure
and stress testing in an explicit way arose as a
consequence of the crisis of past decades. Liquidity
risks usually occur as a consequence of other kinds
of risks, hence analysing scenarios in a prospective
manner is essential for the assessment if the bank
can fulfill its obligations as they come due and if its
funding costs are appropriate. The structural liquidity
risk and the degree of the liquidity mismatch can be
measured based on the liquidity gap analysis, where
expected cash-in- and outflows, divided in different
time-buckets are depicted. The liquidity gap report
(LGR) shows if a liquidity shortcoming appears in
the future and how high is the amount a bank would
have to pay, if any hedging were not possible. This
paper shows how to build a comprehensive LGR
which is the base for both, liquidity and wealth risk
evaluation. To improve the accuracy of the forecast,
the counterbalancing capacity will be incorporated
into the LGR. This tool is a methodological basis for
quantitative and qualitative risk assessment and stress
testing.
Keywords: Liquidity Risk, Stress-testing, Banks, Basel III, Counterbalancing Capacity
View PDF