Sunday, 22 Dec, 2024

+91-9899775880

011-47044510

011-49075396

An Evaluation of Reforms and comparative perspective on Banking Effeciency in India and China

Management Prudence Journal

Volume 3 Issue 1

Published: 2012
Author(s) Name: Sanjeev Bansal
Locked Subscribed Available for All

Abstract

Today, it has become common in the literature to compare India and China, two remarkably growing economies, but these comparisons often do not take into account the institutional differences between these two countries. In this paper, a comparative analysis of banking institutions in China and India has been done. This comparison adopted the CAMEL framework followed by a rigorous comparison using Data Envelopment Analysis. China and India have managed an impressive economic take-off since the opening of their economies in 1978 and 1991 respectively. Both countries have attempted to liberalize and modernize their economies by for example lowering trade barriers, opening their countries for foreign investments and deregulating industries. Because of the rapid economic growth and significant contribution to international economy by China and India, comparative analyses of these two countries have become commonplace nowadays. Starting from management consultants such as McKinsey (Farrell, Khanna, Sinha, Woetzel (2004), Farrell, Lund, Greenberg, Doshi, Rosenfeld, Morin (2006) and Ernst and Young (2006) to Banks (Deutsch Bank 2005) and a number of scholars from different countries (Ahya & Xie 2004, Saez 2004, Tseng & Cowen 2007, Roland 2007) tend to compare these two countries as if they are similar in all respects concerning their institutional and regulatory set up and their developments. In the case of financial institutions, such observations are difficult to justify because the underlying institutional differences between India and China can be quite wide. For example, Roland (2007) on the basis of ratio analysis concluded that the Indian banking sector outperforms the Chinese banks with the exception of cost-income ratio. He attributed this performance difference to faster banking sector reform in India. Similarly, Gamble (2005) tried to compare China’s Construction Bank and India’s ICICI although he did suggest that these two banks cannot be compared. The present paper is multifaceted in nature. In the first part, the developments in Indian and Chinese banking sectors have been compared. This comparison is followed by the analysis of banking sector in two economies through CAMEL framework. In the last part of the paper, a rigorous comparison has been made between various bank groups as well as individual banks in India and china using Data Envelopment Analysis.

View PDF

Refund policy | Privacy policy | Copyright Information | Contact Us | Feedback © Publishingindia.com, All rights reserved